Disaster Management · TEE · papers
Q7B · Describe in brief any 5 key highlights and adverse effects of “Gujarat Earthquake - 2…
2024-12-10 · Semester V final
Actual older TEE paper · 100 marks · Q1 compulsory; any four of Q2–Q7
Q7B. Describe in brief any 5 key highlights and adverse effects of “Gujarat Earthquake - 2001”. [10 marks]
Answer
- Event and setting: On 26 January 2001 a major earthquake struck the Kutch region of Gujarat.
- Causes and vulnerability: Fault rupture caused strong shaking; vulnerable buildings and lifelines amplified losses.
- Impacts: Building collapse, deaths and injuries, disrupted services and large housing and livelihood needs.
- Response and recovery: Search and rescue, medical help and temporary shelter; longer-term reconstruction and institutional strengthening.
- Lessons: Use seismic design and retrofitting, improve construction quality, protect lifelines, train communities, support owner/community participation and rebuild with risk reduction.
Following the 26 January 2001 earthquake, Gujarat’s recovery programme linked reconstruction with longer-term risk reduction. Six relevant measures are:
- Institutional strengthening. GSDMA was established in February 2001 to coordinate reconstruction and develop preparedness and mitigation capacity.
- Safer housing repair and reconstruction. The programme repaired and rebuilt damaged homes; risk reduction requires appropriate earthquake-resistant design and construction quality rather than simple replacement.
- Restoration of critical public facilities. Schools, hospitals, water systems and other public assets were repaired or reconstructed to restore essential functions and improve safety.
- Town planning and access. Reconstruction in affected towns included improved roads, planned open spaces and services, supporting evacuation and future emergency access.
- Training construction workers. Training and certification of masons and capacity building for engineers promoted earthquake-resistant construction practices.
- Community preparedness and long-term systems. Multi-hazard preparedness, community participation and strengthened emergency-management institutions connected recovery to future resilience.